BoatU.S. FoudationFoundation Findings number 43
Findings Home
Foundation Home
Feedback
Story Ideas
BoatU.S. Home
 
Print Article
Why Jerry Jugs?
What's Changed?
CARB vs. Non-CARB
Fill 'er Up!
Testing Protocol
Results: Jerry Jugs
Results: Pumps
Gas Caddies
Where Did the
Fuel Go?
Shopping Tips
Foundation Findings 43 Portable Fueling Devices

Where Did the Fuel Go?

CARB estimates that each year, literally tons of vaporous emissions escape from small portable fuel tanks and therefore requires thicker plastic in the side-walls of jugs as additional prevention. So, we decided to set up a back-yard experiment and see for ourselves.

We took two jerry jugs from the same manufacturer and put them to the test. One jug was CARB-compliant and the other was non-CARB. The only difference between the two was specially treated polyethylene plastic in the CARB jug that is intended to reduce fuel evaporation through the tank walls. Other than the treatment, both cans were identical. We filled both cans with an equal amount of 87% octane fuel, weighed them and put them in the sun for a few months. The results surprised us.

After four months of exposure to direct sunlight in the day and cool temperatures at night the CARB jug had no change in weight. The untreated non-CARB jug lost nearly a pound. There were no leaks, drips or puddles around the can – it simply evaporated, right through the jug! This simple test convinced us that the thicker CARB jug did its job in preventing vaporous emissions.

Proceed to the next page

Evaporation Test
Our test jugs for the backyard evaporation experiemnt were virtually identical, except for the thickness of the plastic.
Chewed Up Nozzle
Though the CARB tank won this round, the squirrels voted the non-CARB tank "Best Tasting."
 
©2007, BoatU.S. Foundation for Boating Safety and Clean Water